Hiring independent contractors is one of the most common legal tasks for startups. Yet there’s still no go-to standard template, unlike the YC SAFE for early-stage financing, for example.
So we built one. And it’s not just a Word doc (though you can download it if you want).
With Skala, you can fill out the agreement online, get tips on key terms, share it with your contractor to collect their info and signature, and store everything in one place.
The agreement starts with a clear definition of the services the contractor will provide.
Parties can choose between a monthly, hourly, or one-time fixed fee — whatever fits your arrangement.
The contractor must issue invoices to get paid. Payment is due within 10 business days, unless the parties agree otherwise.
Any intellectual property (IP) created during the engagement belongs to the client.
Services must be delivered professionally and meet industry standards. It’s broad on purpose — better than leaving quality undefined.
Default term is 12 months, but the parties can adjust it. What’s important is that either party can terminate with 5 days’ written notice.
Parties can choose between New York, United Kingdom, Singapore, or UAE law. That said, parties are free to select any other applicable jurisdiction. While we can’t guarantee enforceability in every country, the template is designed to hold up under the laws of major legal systems. It’s generally recommended to choose the law of the jurisdiction most closely connected to the parties’ shared business.
There is where we couldn’t settle on a single default mechanism for dispute resolution, so we left the choice to the parties: arbitration or state court litigation. Arbitration offers privacy and can be more efficient, but it tends to be more expensive. To balance this, the losing party under this template is required to cover all arbitration costs. State court litigation, on the other hand, is generally simpler and more cost-effective, making it a more common choice for many businesses, though it lacks the confidentiality of arbitration.
An employee works under the company's direction, uses company tools, and is entitled to benefits, payroll tax withholding, and labor protections. An independent contractor operates their own business, typically sets their own hours and methods, and is responsible for their own taxes and insurance. Courts and tax authorities look at how the relationship actually operates — not just what the agreement calls it — to determine the correct classification. Learn more about the difference here.
Misclassification can be costly. The company may owe back payroll taxes, penalties, and interest to the IRS, unpaid overtime and minimum wage to the worker, and — in some states — benefits and unemployment insurance contributions. California applies a particularly strict ABC test that presumes workers are employees unless specific criteria are met. A well-drafted ICA that reflects a genuinely independent relationship helps establish the right classification, but the underlying facts matter most.
Without a written agreement, work created by a contractor may belong to the contractor under U.S. copyright law, unless it qualifies as "work made for hire" under a narrow statutory list. To be safe, the ICA should include an explicit IP assignment clause under which the contractor assigns all work product to the company. This is one of the most important provisions in any contractor agreement and is frequently overlooked.
Both structures work. A project-based agreement defines a specific scope and deadline. A master services agreement (MSA) with individual statements of work is better for ongoing relationships where the scope of each project varies. Either way, a clear description of deliverables and timelines significantly reduces disputes about what was owed and whether it was delivered.
Generally, yes. Independent contractors often work with multiple clients, including in the same industry. However, the agreement can restrict conflicts of interest, misuse of confidential information, solicitation of the client’s customers or personnel, or work that interferes with the contractor’s obligations. Broad non-compete or exclusivity clauses should be used carefully, since enforceability depends on applicable law and overly restrictive terms may undermine the contractor’s independent status.